Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: who is at fault here

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Inactive Member simple man's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 11th, 2008
    Posts
    1,001
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    who is at fault here

    If you ever happen to be "in charge" at work, this puts that job in a little different light for me....

    Hawkeye Contracting Company LLC was cited for three violations in the death of 28-year-old Mark Allen Gray. On July 28, Gray drowned when he ran his rock truck off a haul road and into the sediment-control pond.
    The state Medical Examiner found evidence of marijuana in Gray's blood and that his blood alcohol level was 0.08 percent. Investigators also found an empty beer can in Gray's truck, and a bag containing remnants of marijuana on his person.
    "Alcohol intoxication is a contributing factor" in Gray's death, according to portions of an autopsy cited in a report by the state Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training.
    Mine safety investigators found that a Hawkeye Contracting foreman, Phillip Rife, smelled alcohol on Gray on two occasions prior to the fatal incident. Also, an employee of Appalachian Security, which provided guards for the work site, saw Gray putting unopened cans of beer into his lunchbox at the start of a recent shift, according to the state report.
    Investigators cited Hawkeye for violating a state rule that prohibits anyone from carrying onto a mine site "any intoxicant" or entering any mine site while under the influence. This citation is related to Gray carrying beer and marijuana onto the site.
    Hawkeye also was cited for not following safe work practices, in that Rife, the foreman, allowed Gray to work as a truck driver after smelling alcohol on Gray. Also, Hawkeye was cited for violating a state rule that required the company to remove Gray from the work site "after having reasonable cause to believe that he could be under the influence of alcohol as evidenced by the odor of alcohol on his person detected on two separate occasions by Foreman, Phillip Rife."
    State investigators also issued an "individual proposed assessment" to Rife for not removing Gray from the mine site.
    Appalachian Security was cited for not taking action when its guard saw Gray putting unopened beer cans into his lunchbox.

    I can understand part of that train of thought, but does your foreman/boss get in your face enough to smell your breath everyday? Next gen of mining equipment will have a drug test before you start each shift, I guess.

    Contractor cited in coal miner's death * - Business - The Charleston Gazette - West Virginia News and Sports
    We'll keep the lights on for you.
    Spuds

  2. #2
    Inactive Member MikeJones's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 8th, 2007
    Posts
    3,888
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: who is at fault here

    Wow sounds like like they placed the blame on everybody.

    Alcohol sensors on equipment wouldn't be to far fetched i don't suppose. They make em for cars. Mining inviroment may be to harsh for them to stay functioning tho.
    GO VOLS

  3. #3
    Inactive Member sup-rbeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 27th, 2006
    Posts
    8,846
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: who is at fault here

    If he had alcohol and pot on him, then you have to conclude that he was using on the job...but that doesn't mean the work area was in compliance with safety standards either...so I can see where there may be more than one person at fault in the guy's death.
    ...And if you ain't down with that, I got 2 words for ya....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •